The Doctrine of the Trinity

The Trinity, which asserts that God exists as three persons (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) but is of one ​essence, is not explicitly outlined in the Bible. The term "Trinity" itself is absent from the scripture. This ​concept is challenged by several verses:

• John 14:28 – Jesus states, "The Father is greater than I," which implies a hierarchical relationship ​between Jesus and God, contradicting the claim that they are co-equal. If they were truly one ​essence, Jesus should not acknowledge a superior in this way.
  
• Mark 13:32 – Jesus admits ignorance about the day or hour of the end times: "But of that day and ​that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father." ​This reveals a limitation in Jesus’ knowledge, which conflicts with the divine attribute of ​omniscience.

Some argue that Jesus, while on Earth, voluntarily limited his divine knowledge as part of his human ​experience.

However if Jesus could "limit" his divine attributes, then he was not fully divine during his time on Earth. ​Divinity implies unchanging attributes such as omniscience and omnipotence, and any temporary ​relinquishment of these would logically mean Jesus was not fully God in that state.

What about the verses that supposedly support the Trinity?

1 John 5:7 (The Comma Johanneum): "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the ​Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." However, this verse is widely recognized as a later ​addition to the Bible, not present in the earliest manuscripts.

• The phrase "the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one" (known as the ​Comma Johanneum) is not found in any Greek manuscripts before the 14th century. It first ​appeared in Latin manuscripts in the 4th century and was likely added to support Trinitarian ​doctrine during theological debates in the early church. Most modern Bible translations, such as the ​New International Version (NIV) and English Standard Version (ESV), omit this passage or include it ​with a footnote acknowledging it as a later addition.
  

The fact that a key Trinitarian proof text was added centuries after the original writing discredits its use ​as solid biblical evidence for the Trinity.

Matthew 28:19, where Jesus says: "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in ​the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit." This verse appears to present a Trinitarian ​formula, but its authenticity and historical context have been questioned.

• Historical Context: Some scholars argue that the original baptismal formula in the early church may ​have been simpler, focusing only on baptizing in Jesus' name, as indicated by verses like Acts 2:38​ ("Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your ​sins"). This simpler formula was widely used in the early church, and there is little evidence that a ​Trinitarian baptismal formula was in widespread use before the 4th century.
  
• Scholarly Dispute: Scholars such as Eusebius of Caesarea (a 4th-century church historian) quoted ​Matthew 28:19 numerous times without the Trinitarian formula, suggesting that the verse may have ​been altered in later copies to reflect the developing doctrine of the Trinity.
  

The possible alteration of this verse raises doubts about its authenticity as a clear Trinitarian ​declaration, undermining its use as evidence for the Trinity.

John 10:30 – “I and the Father are One” Supporters of the Trinity often cite John 10:30 where Jesus ​says, "I and the Father are one." However, this verse is frequently misunderstood in a Trinitarian sense. ​Historically and contextually, Jesus is not claiming to be of the same essence as God but rather ​asserting a unity of purpose and mission.

• Historical Context: The Greek word used for "one" here is "hen," which refers to unity of purpose ​rather than unity of essence. This interpretation aligns with Jesus' other statements emphasizing his ​submission to the Father, such as John 14:28 ("The Father is greater than I") and John 5:30 ("By ​myself I can do nothing").
  

Historically, Jewish monotheism was strict, and the concept of God being divided into persons would ​have been foreign and contradictory. Jesus' statement is better understood as an affirmation of his ​unity with God's will, not a claim to co-equality or shared essence with God the Father.

The Evolving Nature of Christology in the New Testament The New Testament itself reflects an ​evolving understanding of Jesus' nature, rather than a consistent Trinitarian view from the beginning. ​The earlier Synoptic Gospels(Matthew, Mark, and Luke) portray Jesus as a human prophet and messiah, ​while the later Gospel of John begins to emphasize Jesus’ divine nature more strongly. This shift ​suggests that the doctrine of the Trinity developed over time rather than being present from the outset ​of Christian belief.

• Synoptic Gospels: In Mark 10:18, Jesus says, "Why do you call me good? No one is good—except ​God alone." This statement clearly distinguishes Jesus from God.
  
• Gospel of John: By the time of John's Gospel, there are more declarations of Jesus’ divinity, such ​as John 1:1 ("In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God"). ​However, even here, Jesus is depicted as subordinate to the Father in several passages.
  

The evolving depiction of Jesus in the New Testament suggests that the doctrine of the Trinity is not an ​original or clear teaching of Jesus himself but a theological construct that developed in response to ​changing Christological views.

The Nicene Creed and Later Additions Historically, the doctrine of the Trinity was formalized during ​the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, more than 300 years after the life of Jesus. The purpose of this ​council was to address the Arian controversy, where Arius, a presbyter in Alexandria, argued that Jesus ​was created by God and therefore not co-eternal or co-equal with Him. The decision to adopt the ​Trinity was as much a political move to unite the church as it was a theological decision based on ​scripture.

• Historical Reality: The Nicene Creed was developed in response to theological conflicts, and the ​Trinitarian formulation was a compromise designed to reconcile differing views of Jesus’ nature. ​This makes it clear that the doctrine was not a universally accepted or original Christian belief.
  

The fact that the Trinity needed to be formalized in a council centuries after the New Testament was ​written underscores that it was not a clear teaching of early Christianity.

In conclusion, the concept of the Trinity does not hold up under logical scrutiny or scriptural analysis. ​The Bible provides no clear or consistent evidence supporting the idea of a triune God, and many ​verses directly contradict the core tenets of this doctrine. Jesus’ statements about his subordinate ​relationship to the Father and his limited knowledge fundamentally undermine the notion of co-equality ​and omniscience required for divinity. Furthermore, key Trinitarian proof texts like 1 John 5:7 and ​Matthew 28:19 are either later additions or historically disputed, which weakens their reliability.

The fact that the doctrine was not formalized until centuries after Jesus' death, during the Council of ​Nicaea, further demonstrates that the Trinity is a theological invention rather than a clear biblical truth. ​A doctrine that must evolve over time, requiring extensive debate and interpolation, is logically ​inconsistent with the idea of a timeless, fundamental truth about God.

Therefore, based on logic and scripture, the Trinity fails to accurately represent the nature of God and ​was likely developed to resolve theological conflicts rather than reflect an original Christian belief.

back to top

Incarnation Theology

Incarnation theology claims that Jesus was fully divine and fully human but "emptied" himself of certain ​divine privileges during his time on Earth, based on Philippians 2:6-7. However, this presents a ​contradiction.

• Divinity implies possessing unchanging attributes (e.g., omniscience and omnipotence) at all ​times. If Jesus lacked these attributes during his life on Earth, he was not fully divine at that time. ​The idea that he could be "fully divine" yet missing core attributes such as omniscience seems ​logically inconsistent.
  

The doctrine of kenosis argues that Jesus voluntarily "emptied" himself of certain divine attributes ​without ceasing to be divine.

This is problematic because divinity cannot be selectively "turned off." If Jesus was lacking essential ​divine attributes, this raises the question of whether he could still be considered truly divine during his ​earthly ministry. In short being divine and not divine at the same time is logically contradictory.

The Bible itself supports the understanding that God’s nature is unchanging and all-encompassing, as ​seen in verses such as Numbers 23:19: "God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that ​he should change his mind."

These contradictions point toward a more consistent understanding of Jesus as a prophet rather than ​God.

back to top

Interpretation of "Son of God"

The title "Son of God" is often cited as evidence of Jesus' divinity. However, other figures in the Bible ​are also called "sons of God," including:

• Hosea 11:1 – Israel is referred to as God’s "son."
  
• Romans 8:14 – Followers of God are called "sons of God."

The term "son of" in ancient Jewish culture often represented a close relationship, not a literal divine ​sonship. Therefore, calling Jesus the "Son of God" may simply reflect his special role, not divinity.

• John 20:17 – Jesus says, "I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God," ​placing himself in the same relationship with God as his followers.
  

Christians argue that Jesus being called the "Son of God" is unique and signifies his divine nature.

This is problematic because Bible uses "Son of God" metaphorically for others as well, and Jesus ​himself places his relationship with God on par with that of his disciples, which weakens the argument ​that this title implies inherent divinity.

back to top

Jesus’ Miracles and Forgiveness of Sins

Jesus performed miracles and forgave sins, but these acts do not necessarily prove divinity. For ​example:

• Old Testament Prophets – Figures like Elijah and Elisha also performed miracles, including raising ​the dead (1 Kings 17:22, 2 Kings 4:34-35). They were not considered divine.
  
• John 5:30 – Jesus says, "By myself I can do nothing... I seek not to please myself but him who sent ​me," indicating that his power comes from God, not from himself.

Many argue that Jesus’ ability to forgive sins proves his divinity since only God can forgive sins.

Jesus could have been granted divine authority by God to forgive sins, just as prophets were ​empowered to perform miracles. This would not make him inherently divine but rather a messenger of ​God with special authority.

back to top

Resurrection as Proof of Divinity

The resurrection of Jesus is often viewed as proof of his divinity. However, the Bible records other ​resurrections performed by God's power:

• John 11:43-44 – Lazarus is resurrected by Jesus, but it is clear this was done through God’s power.
  
• Acts 2:24 – The resurrection of Jesus is attributed to God: "But God raised him from the dead."
  

Is Jesus’ resurrection unique and proves his divine nature?

If God raised Jesus from the dead, this implies that Jesus himself did not hold the power over life and ​death, but rather that God, the Father, did. This distinction complicates claims that Jesus is equal to ​God.

back to top

Jesus Accepts Worship

Jesus accepting worship is sometimes seen as an acknowledgment of his divinity. However, other ​figures in the Bible receive reverence without being divine:

• Revelation 3:9 – People bow at the feet of others in reverence, not worship.
  
• John 4:23 – Jesus emphasizes that true worship is directed toward the Father.
  

He consistently directed praise and worship to God the Father:

• Matthew 4:10 – Jesus says, "Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only."
  

Some argue that the worship Jesus received proves his divinity.

Worship in the Bible can be an act of reverence, not necessarily proof of divinity. Jesus himself ​redirected worship toward the Father, indicating that he did not see himself as the object of worship in ​the same way God is.

back to top

Harmonization of Scriptures

Many Christians argue that verses showing Jesus’ subordination to God refer to his human nature, not ​his divine essence. However, this explanation leads to contradictions:

• Divinity implies omniscience and omnipotence. If Jesus is fully divine, he should not be ignorant ​or limited in any capacity. Separating his human and divine natures to explain such contradictions ​seems like an artificial solution that raises more questions than it answers.
  

But can the two natures of Jesus (human and divine) can exist simultaneously without contradiction?

No, Claiming that Jesus is fully divine and fully human yet not omniscient at certain times undermines ​the coherence of his divinity. This explanation is often seen as an attempt to reconcile irreconcilable ​contradictions.

Many justifications for Jesus’ divinity rely on complex theological constructs like the Trinity or ​Incarnation, which are not explicitly supported by the Bible and often contradict the plain meaning of ​scriptural passages. The attempts to explain away Jesus' limitations or subordinate status create logical ​inconsistencies, making the claims of his divinity less tenable when scrutinized in light of both scripture ​and reason.

back to top

Jesus as a Prophet in the Bible

back to top

The Message of Islam About Jesus

In Islam, Jesus (known as Isa) is one of the greatest and most honored prophets, but he is not ​considered divine or the son of God. The Quran affirms that Jesus was born to the Virgin Mary ​(Maryam) and performed miracles by the permission of God, but he was a human being and servant of ​God.

Quran 4:171: "O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except ​the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His word which He ​directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers. ​And do not say, 'Three'; desist—it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above ​having a son."

Islam emphasizes the oneness of God (Tawhid), rejecting the notion of the Trinity and the divinity of ​Jesus. Jesus is revered as a prophet who brought the message of God to the people, calling them to ​worship the One God and live righteous lives. According to Islam, Jesus will return at the end of times ​to restore justice, but he is not to be worshipped.

Quran 5:75: "The Messiah, son of Mary, was no more than a messenger; many were the messengers ​who passed away before him. His mother was a woman of truth. They both ate food. See how We make ​the signs clear to them; yet see in what ways they are deluded away from the truth!"

This verse highlights Jesus' humanity. He, like all messengers, was a mortal who lived according to God's ​will.

back to top

By analyzing the Bible, we can see that Jesus consistently referred to himself as a servant, messenger, and prophet of ​God. He performed miracles by God's permission, prayed to God, and submitted to God's will—all characteristics of a ​prophet, not a divine being. This aligns with the Islamic view of Jesus (Isa), who is revered as a prophet sent to guide the ​Children of Israel.

The Bible and the Torah were both sent as revelations for their specific times and peoples. For example, Deuteronomy ​4:44 says, "This is the law Moses set before the Israelites," indicating that the Torah was specifically meant for the ​Israelites. Similarly, in Matthew 15:24, Jesus says, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel," showing that his mission was ​also directed toward a particular group.

In contrast, Islam, as revealed in the Quran, is the final and universal message sent by God for all of humanity and for all ​time. Quran 34:28 says: "And We have not sent you, [O Muhammad], except comprehensively to mankind as a bringer of ​good tidings and a warner. But most of the people do not know." This makes Islam a timeless and all-encompassing ​guide, meant to be followed by everyone, regardless of nation, race, or era, until the end of time.

Thus, while previous scriptures were tailored to specific peoples and contexts, Islam is the final, complete message, ​offering guidance to all of humanity for eternity.

Embrace the truth of Jesus as a prophet and discover the comprehensive and final message of Islam, calling all of humanity to the worship ​of the one true God.

JesusTheProphet.org